Ultimate NYG has moved!

You should be automatically redirected in 5 seconds. If not, visit
www.ultimatenyg.com
and update your bookmarks.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

You guys are smarter than me...

After the draft was over, we asked: "Which draft pick do you like the most?" The winner was 93 people out of 214 taking Ramses Barden. This was in MAY. It was only ONE (preseason) game, but clearly you guys did a very impressive job. Sintim had the best rookie evening, but Barden looks the part. And you guys did not flinch this past week when asked which WR was going to breakout this season, going for Barden again. Smith did not play, but if anything was clear from Monday night, Barden is certainly out of the blocks faster than Nicks. THIS IS A MARATHON, NOT A SPRINT. So do not think for a second that Nicks is not going to be seen or heard from again. That is RIDICULOUS. What we are talking about here is the simple observation from camp (one data point) and Preseason Game 1 (second data point) that Barden looks good so far. We saw bits and pieces of good and bad things from all of the WRs... it is a work in progress but they are getting there. Moss did some good things. Manningham got separation. Barden looks so good once he gets off the line. If he put on another 10-15 lbs he could be a tremendous TE. How do you guard that?!

Kudos to Oxbay, Mitch, Craig and Wonder for nailing the idea of the Round 3 big WR ON APRIL FREAKING 7th. THREE WEEKS BEFORE THE DRAFT. Having had success with the Ed McCaffreys and Joe Jureviciuses of the world, we'd be much better served here in the third round with Patrick Turner or Ramses Barden than going for the glamour divas of Round 1. Those Round 2 (and Round 3) guys have their heads screwed on properly and they have the requisite physical tools (read: pedigree) to make it in the NFL. We're not implying that Nicks is a diva, just that WR is not worth it in Round 1. Doesn't the optimism of a Barden in Round 3 make that argument more plausible?!

Nicks can end up in the Hall of Fame. Guys like Barden and Turner can both be busts. But you want the upside if you are right. The upside in these guys?.?.?..I'd rather be good and 6'6" than good and 6'2". In 2007, how much of the Super Bowl Title that the Giants won was due to Toomer being 6'3", Burress 6'5" and Boss 6'6"?? You cannot teach genes. Remember Mike's quote on George Young: "I'll take size over speed every time. In the fourth quarter the fast guys slow down but the big guys are still big." Here is to Barden in Q4.

3 comments:

Bob said...

Andy

Looks like you may have got your LB
after all........Sintim. Looks good
coming off the edge. But can he play
MLB & replace Pierce ?

Bob said...

Gillbrown continues past bad habits.
How many series were RRPK ?

How many balls were thrown to our great tight end ?

How many balls were thrown downfield ?

I'm starting to cringe !!

Kruunch said...

I'd rather see Sintim carry the left side rush. He looked promising in that spot and having a strongside pass rush that you have to worry about doubling or chipping is awesome (re: Strahan).

I'd rather get a slightly smaller slightly faster guy for the MLB spot who can run coverage when needed (Sintim is fast as a pass rusher, but I don't think he could pull off coverage duties consistantly ... also he wasn't known for his run stuffing in college).

Bob: Totally agree about Gillbride ... it's almost like watching the mid 90s Giants playbook in action. Even worse, since Eli's bread and butter throwing is the long ball. I'm cringing right there with you.

Sports Business Directory - BTS Local
Blog Directory - Blogged